Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNeetu, S.
dc.contributor.authorSuresh, I.
dc.contributor.authorShankar, R.
dc.contributor.authorShankar, D.
dc.contributor.authorShenoi, S.S.C.
dc.contributor.authorShetye, S.R.
dc.contributor.authorSundar, D.
dc.contributor.authorNagarajan, B.
dc.date.accessioned2006-05-12T11:43:35Z
dc.date.available2006-05-12T11:43:35Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.identifier.citationScience, vol. 310(5753), 1431a
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencemag.org/content/vol310/issue5753/index.dtl
dc.identifier.urihttp://drs.nio.org/drs/handle/2264/102
dc.description.abstractLay et al. (Special Section, 20 May 2005, p.1127) estimated a 600-km length for the tsunami source region. Adding tide-gauge data from Paradip, the northernmost of the Indian east-coast stations and therefore the most critical constraint on the northern extent of the source, we estimate that its length was greater by ~30%.
dc.format.extent122705 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAmerican Association for the Advancement of Science
dc.subjectTsunami
dc.subjectSource
dc.subjectRay Tracing
dc.subjectIndian Ocean
dc.subjectSumatra Earthquake
dc.subjectTide Gauge
dc.titleComment on "The Great Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake of 26 December 2004"
dc.typeJournal Article


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record