Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSyamPrasad, M.
dc.contributor.authorRudraswami, N.G.
dc.contributor.authordeAraujo, A.A.
dc.contributor.authorKhedekar, V.D.
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-06
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-23T09:24:47Z
dc.date.available2018-02-01
dc.date.available2018-10-23T09:24:47Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationMeteoritics & Planetary Science, vol.53(2); 2018; 333-340
dc.identifier.issn1945-5100
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/maps.13010
dc.identifier.urihttp://drs.nio.org/drs/handle/2264/7724
dc.description.abstractThis is an extended reply to the comments made on the paper entitled "Unmelted cosmic metal particles from the Indian Ocean" by M. Genge and M. Van Ginneken. The authors states that the hypotheses throughout the comment paper are based on erroneous assumptions and lack of understanding of magnetic methods of cosmic dust collections from the deep-sea sediments.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.ispartofMeteorit Planet Sci
dc.relation.isreferencedbySCI
dc.titleReply to the comment by M. Genge and M. Van Ginneken on paper entitled "Unmelted cosmic metal particles from the Indian Ocean".
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.affiliation.authorCSIR-National Institute of Oceanography, Dona Paula, Goa, India


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record