Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSaalim, S.M.
dc.contributor.authorSaraswat, R.
dc.contributor.authorSuokhrie, T.
dc.contributor.authorBhadra, S.R.
dc.contributor.authorKurtarkar, S.R.
dc.contributor.authorNigam, R.
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-06
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-23T09:24:53Z
dc.date.available2017-10-23
dc.date.available2018-10-23T09:24:53Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationEnvironmental Earth Sciences, vol.76(20); 2017; Article no: 706
dc.identifier.issn1866-6299
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-7052-4
dc.identifier.urihttp://drs.nio.org/drs/handle/2264/7785
dc.description.abstractBeing sensitive to environmental changes, foraminifera have been extensively used to monitor pollution level in the marine environment, including the effect of mining in coastal areas. In the Goa state of India, the rejects from opencast mining on land largely find their way to the estuaries, as washout during monsoon. Additionally, the Mormugao Port at the mouth of the Zuari estuary is the hub of activities due to the transport of ore from hinterland areas by barges and its subsequent loading for export. On the directive of the Supreme Court of India, all the mining-related activities abruptly stopped throughout India, including that in Goa in 2012, and got reinstated in 2015. Therefore, it provided a fit case to test the effectiveness of benthic foraminifera as an indicator of environmental impact due to mining activities. A total of ten surface sediment samples from five locations in Zuari estuary were collected from a depth range of 4.5-8.5 m in the years of 2013 and 2016 and were analyzed for both the living (stained) and dead benthic foraminifera. The year 2013 represents a time interval immediately after the closure of extensive mining activity, and the sampling during 2016 represents minimal mining. The living benthic foraminiferal abundance was higher (19-54/g sediment) during 2013 and decreased substantially during 2016 (3-22/g sediment), suggesting an adverse effect of activities associated with mine closure on benthic foraminifera. Additionally, the relative abundance of Ammonia was also significantly low during the year 2016. The temporal variation in dead foraminifera was, however, different than that of the living foraminifera. The differential response was attributed to the terrigenous dilution as a result of change in sedimentation rate. Therefore, we conclude that living foraminifera correctly incorporate the changes in mining pattern and may be used as an effective tool to monitor the impact of mining. We further suggest that the potential counter effect of terrigenous dilution on total and living benthic foraminiferal population should be considered while interpreting temporal variations in foraminiferal abundance in marginal marine settings.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofEnviron Earth Sci
dc.relation.isreferencedbySCI
dc.titleBenthic foraminiferal response to changes in mining pattern: a case study from the Zuari estuary, Goa, India
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.affiliation.authorCSIR-National Institute of Oceanography, Dona Paula, Goa, India


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record