Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPrasad, P.
dc.contributor.authorLoveson, V.J.
dc.contributor.authorDas, Sumit
dc.contributor.authorChandra, P.
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-01
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-20T10:40:41Z
dc.date.available2021-10-21
dc.date.available2022-06-20T10:40:41Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationEnvironmental Earth Sciences, vol.80(21); 2021; Article no: 720
dc.identifier.issn1866-6299
dc.identifier.otherhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-021-10033-w
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/S12665-021-10033-W
dc.identifier.urihttps://drs.nio.org/drs/handle/2264/8754
dc.description2.784
dc.description.abstractThe prediction of landslide is a complex task but preparing the landslide susceptibility map through artificial intelligence approaches can reduce life loss and damages resulting from landslides. The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM) using six machine learning models, including random forest (RF), deep boost (DB), stochastic gradient boosting (SGB), rotation forest (RoF), boosted regression tree (BRT), and logit boost (LB) in the mountainous regions of western India. The landslide inventory map consisting of 184 landslide locations has been divided into two groups for training (70% data set) and validation (30% data set) purposes. Fourteen landslide triggering factors including slope, topographical roughness index, road density, topographical wetness index, elevation, slope length, drainage density, stream power index, geomorphology, rainfall, soil, lithology, lineament density, and normalized difference vegetation index have been considered using the boruta approach for the LSM. The results reveal that the RF model has the highest precision in terms of area under curve (0.88; 0.89), kappa (0.62; 0.50), accuracy (0.81; 0.77), and specificity (0.86; 0.86) both in the study region and secondary region, respectively. Hence, it can be concluded that the RF is an effective and promising technique as compared to DB, SGB, RoF, BRT, and LB for landslide susceptibility assessment in the research area as well as in regions having similar geo-environmental configuration
dc.languageen
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.isreferencedbySCI
dc.rightsOnly the author version of the copright reserved papers uploaded. Contact drs@nio.org for any complaints regarding copyright violations
dc.titleArtificial intelligence approaches for spatial prediction of landslides in mountainous regions of western India
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.affiliation.authorCSIR-National Institute of Oceanography, Dona Paula, Goa, India


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record