The aquaculture supply chain in the time of covid-19 pandemic: Vulnerability, resilience, solutions and priorities at the global scale
View/ Open
Date
2022Author
Mangano, M.C.
Berlino, M.
Corbari, L.
Milisenda, G.
Lucchese, M.
Terzo, S.
Bosch-Belmar, M.
Azaza, M.S.
Babarro, J.M.F.
Bakiu, R.
Broitman, B.R.
Buschmann, A.H.
Christofoletti, R.
Dong, Y.
Glamuzina, B.
Luthman, O.
Makridis, P.
Nogueira, A.J.A.
Palomo, M.G.
Dineshram, R.
Sanchez-Jerez, P.
Sevgili, H.
Troell, M.
AbouelFadl, K.Y.
Azra, M.N.
Britz, P.
Carrington, E.
Celi?, I.
Choi, F.
Qin, C.
Dionisio, M.A.
Dobroslavic, T.
Galli, P.
Giannetto, D.
Grabowski, J.H.
Helmuth, B.
Lebata-Ramos, M.J.H.
Lim, P.T.
Liu, Y.
Llorens, S.M.
Mirto, S.
Pecarevic, M.
Pita, C.
Ragg, N.
Ravagnan, E.
Saidi, D.
Schultz, K.
Shaltout, M.
Tan, S.H.
Thiyagarajan, V.
Sara, G.
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
The COVID-19 global pandemic has had severe, unpredictable and synchronous impacts on all levels of perishable food supply chains (PFSC), across multiple sectors and spatial scales. Aquaculture plays a vital and rapidly expanding role in food security, in some cases overtaking wild caught fisheries in the production of high-quality animal protein in this PFSC. We performed a rapid global assessment to evaluate the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and related emerging control measures on the aquaculture supply chain. Socio-economic effects of the pandemic were analysed by surveying the perceptions of stakeholders, who were asked to describe potential supply-side disruption, vulnerabilities and resilience patterns along the production pipeline with four main supply chain components: a) hatchery, b) production/processing, c) distribution/logistics and d) market. We also assessed different farming strategies, comparing land- vs. sea-based systems; extensive vs. intensive methods; and with and without integrated multi-trophic aquaculture, IMTA. In addition to evaluating levels and sources of economic distress, interviewees were asked to identify mitigation solutions adopted at local / internal (i.e., farm-site) scales, and to express their preference on national / external scale mitigation measures among a set of a priori options. Survey responses identified the potential causes of disruption, ripple effects, sources of food insecurity, and socio-economic conflicts. They also pointed to various levels of mitigation strategies. The collated evidence represents a first baseline useful to address future disaster-driven responses, to reinforce the resilience of the sector and to facilitate the design reconstruction plans and mitigation measures, such as financial aid strategies.
Collections
- Scholarly literature [8950]